The concept of immunity is deeply fascinating. While it serves a vital role in protecting persons from excessive prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be misused to shield the guilty from responsibility. This raises a critical question: does immunity, intended as a safeguard against unfair treatment, fundamentally become a shield against

Presidential immunity, a concept deeply inscribed in the American legal fabric, often sparks fierce debate. Proponents argue that it's essential for efficient governance, shielding presidents from meritless lawsuits and allowing them to devote their attention to national issues. Conversely, critics contend that it creates an unjust playing field, p